Latest Cybersecurity Best Practices 2026: A Practical Checklist and 2025 vs. 2026 Trends
Quick answer
The latest cybersecurity best practices for 2026 are still the basics, done with proof: identity controls, KEV-driven patching, verified backups and restores, focused logging, and vendor controls. Use the checklist below to confirm what exists, what can be verified quickly, and what must be owned and tracked weekly.
Latest cybersecurity best practices 2026
Use this list as an operator checklist. Each best practice includes what to verify, not just what to buy.
-
Harden identity first (admins, high-risk users, and machine identities)
Require strong MFA for privileged roles, reduce standing privilege, and remove shared admin accounts. Treat service accounts and API keys as first-class security objects with owners, rotation, and logging.
What to verify: phishing-resistant MFA for admins, monthly privileged access review, and evidence of key rotation for critical machine identities.
-
Patch based on active exploitation, then prove coverage
Prioritize fixes for vulnerabilities that are actively exploited and for exposed systems. A calendar-based patch cycle is not enough if your environment includes internet-facing services.
What to verify: a weekly review of known exploited issues, SLAs by severity, and a way to confirm exposure and remediation status.
-
Make backup and recovery measurable (immutable backups plus restore tests)
Backups matter only if you can restore quickly. Use immutability, isolate backup credentials, and run restore tests that include identity systems and key apps.
What to verify: restore evidence, time-to-restore metrics, and a clean recovery path for ransomware scenarios.
-
Standardize secure configurations, then detect drift
Most environments fail from configuration gaps. Set baseline configurations for endpoints, servers, cloud accounts, and key SaaS settings, then monitor drift.
What to verify: baseline ownership, drift detection, and remediation workflows.
-
Focus logging on decision-grade events
Centralize identity events, privileged actions, endpoint security events, cloud control plane logs, and critical application logs. Keep retention and access controls clear.
What to verify: log coverage for identity and admin actions, a retention policy, and alert ownership.
-
Run a weekly security operating cadence
A weekly cadence prevents “security as a report.” Track patch posture, identity risks, top alerts, and vendor issues in a short meeting with owners and dates.
What to verify: a standing meeting, a short KPI set, and a working actions log.
-
Reduce third-party exposure with evidence and contract controls
Require evidence for critical vendors (SOC reports or equivalent), define breach notification timing, and confirm data processing obligations. Re-assess after major changes such as acquisitions or platform moves.
What to verify: vendor inventory, a review checklist, and re-assessment triggers.
-
Address AI risk where your business actually uses AI
Inventory AI usage (chat tools, copilots, internal models, vendor features). Control access, logging, and data exposure. Add reviews for prompt injection and sensitive data leakage for AI-enabled workflows.
What to verify: an AI usage inventory, access controls, logging, and clear handling rules for sensitive data.
Sources: [S1], [S2], [S3], [S4], External:
NIST CSF 2.0,
CISA KEV Catalog,
CIS Controls v8,
Verizon DBIR 2025
Copy/paste checklist (30-day verification)
30-day checklist (copy/paste)
Identity
[ ] Admin accounts require strong MFA (prefer phishing-resistant methods)
[ ] No shared admin accounts; break-glass is controlled and monitored
[ ] Monthly privileged access review with evidence (who, what, when)
Exploitation-driven patching
[ ] Weekly review of known exploited issues and exposed systems
[ ] Patch SLAs tracked; exceptions have owners and end dates
[ ] Internet-facing assets inventory exists and is reviewed
Recovery
[ ] Immutable backups exist; backup credentials are isolated
[ ] Restore tests completed with evidence; time-to-restore tracked
[ ] Ransomware recovery plan includes identity systems and endpoints
Monitoring
[ ] Central logs include identity, privileged actions, endpoints, and cloud control plane events
[ ] Alert ownership and on-call coverage defined
[ ] Weekly review reduces noisy alerts and improves detection quality
Third-party
[ ] Vendor inventory exists with data access and criticality noted
[ ] Evidence collected for critical vendors (SOC reports or equivalent)
[ ] Contract terms reviewed for breach notification, data processing, and sub-processors
AI usage
[ ] AI tools and features inventory exists (internal and vendor-provided)
[ ] Sensitive data handling rules are defined and enforced
[ ] Logging and access controls are in place for AI-enabled workflows
Sources: [S2], [S3], [S5], External:
Google Cybersecurity Forecast 2025,
ISACA State of Cybersecurity 2025
Cybersecurity trends in 2026 and cyber security trends for 2025
Treat 2025 reports as baselines and 2026 planning content as prioritization inputs. Then prove what is true in your environment through weekly tracking.
| Theme | 2025 baseline | 2026 emphasis |
|---|---|---|
| Exploitation and patching | Vulnerability exploitation and third-party exposure remain common drivers | Faster exploitation means KEV-driven patching and exposure verification matter more |
| Identity-led attacks | Credential attacks and social engineering stay effective | More machine identities and AI-enabled social engineering increase identity pressure |
| Ransomware and extortion | Business disruption continues; recovery speed is decisive | Restore testing and clean recovery paths become non-negotiable |
| AI in security | AI adoption rises in both offense and defense | AI-supported security operations and AI risk control become common priorities |
Sources: [S4], [S5], [S6], External:
Verizon DBIR 2025,
Google Cybersecurity Forecast 2025,
ISACA State of Cybersecurity 2025,
Gartner 2026 Cybersecurity Planning Guide
What is the 80 20 rule in cyber security?
In practice, the 80/20 rule is a focus tool: a small set of controls often reduces most real risk. For many organizations, the “20%” that matters most is:
- Identity hardening for admins and critical systems
- Fast remediation for known exploited issues
- Backups that are immutable plus restore tests
- Logging and response routines that create action, not noise
- Vendor controls for systems that touch sensitive data
Sources: [S1], [S2], [S3], External:
NIST CSF 2.0,
CISA KEV Catalog,
CIS Controls v8
What is the next big thing in cyber security?
“Next big thing” depends on your maturity. Many teams are prioritizing AI-supported security operations, better control of machine identities, and stronger provenance for software and AI-generated content. The safest approach is to adopt these while keeping the fundamentals measurable and owned.
Sources: [S7], [S8], External:
Gartner Top Technology Trends for 2026,
Gartner press release
FAQ
What are the cybersecurity trends in 2026?
Faster exploitation, identity-led attacks, continued ransomware and extortion, growing third-party exposure, and new risks from AI systems and AI agents. The practical response is identity hardening, KEV-driven patching, tested recovery, and measurable detection and response.
What are the cyber security trends for 2025?
Ransomware pressure, third-party involvement, and social engineering remain common themes. Use 2025 reporting as baselines, then verify your controls with weekly tracking and evidence.
What is the 80 20 rule in cyber security?
It is a focus tool: prioritize the few controls that reduce most real risk. In many organizations, identity controls, fast remediation for known exploited issues, verified recovery, and vendor controls deliver the largest improvement quickly.
What is the next big thing in cyber security?
Many teams are prioritizing AI-supported security operations, stronger control of machine identities, and better provenance for software and AI-generated content. The best outcomes come when these are added on top of strong identity, patching, recovery, and monitoring routines.
If you want a 30/60/90 security plan with owners and measurable outcomes:
contact NMS Consulting.
Sources
- S1. NIST, “CSF 2.0” (NIST CSWP 29, Feb 26, 2024). Accessed 2026-01-02. https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/CSWP/NIST.CSWP.29.pdf
- S2. CISA, “Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog.” Accessed 2026-01-02. https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog
- S3. Center for Internet Security, “CIS Critical Security Controls v8.” Accessed 2026-01-02. https://www.cisecurity.org/controls/v8
- S4. Verizon, “2025 Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR).” Accessed 2026-01-02. https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/
- S5. Google, “Cybersecurity Forecast 2025” (PDF infographic). Accessed 2026-01-02. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/cybersecurity-forecast-2025-infographic.pdf
- S6. ISACA, “State of Cybersecurity 2025.” Accessed 2026-01-02. https://www.isaca.org/resources/state-of-cybersecurity
- S7. Gartner, “2026 Cybersecurity Planning Guide for Technical Professionals.” Accessed 2026-01-02. https://www.gartner.com/en/cybersecurity/insights/2026-planning-guide-for-cybersecurity
- S8. Gartner, “Top Strategic Technology Trends for 2026.” Accessed 2026-01-02. https://www.gartner.com/en/articles/top-technology-trends-2026
